In late November, the Justice Department unsealed indictments against eight people accused of fleecing advertisers of $36 million in two of the largest digital ad-fraud operations ever uncovered. Digital advertisers tend to want two things: people to look at their ads and “premium” websites — i.e., established and legitimate publications — on which to host them.
The two schemes at issue in the case, dubbed Methbot and 3ve by the security researchers who found them, faked both. Hucksters infected 1.7 million computers with malware that remotely directed traffic to “spoofed” websites — “empty websites designed for bot traffic” that served up a video ad purchased from one of the internet’s vast programmatic ad-exchanges, but that were designed, according to the indictments, “to fool advertisers into thinking that an impression of their ad was served on a premium publisher site,” like that of Vogueor The Economist. Views, meanwhile, were faked by malware-infected computers with marvelously sophisticated techniques to imitate humans: bots “faked clicks, mouse movements, and social network login information to masquerade as engaged human consumers.” Some were sent to browse the internet to gather tracking cookies from other websites, just as a human visitor would have done through regular behavior. Fake people with fake cookies and fake social-media accounts, fake-moving their fake cursors, fake-clicking on fake websites — the fraudsters had essentially created a simulacrum of the internet, where the only real things were the ads.
Read More … Source: Nymag
Disclaimer: This section is a compilation of news, articles, updates and information (“Updates”) related to payments,fintech, banking and other industry. All Updates belong to the source provided after every such Update. FIAKS does not have and in no manner claims to have any intellectual property rights in the content, images, pdf, videos etc. in any of the Updates. This section has been created for knowledge sharing/education purposes for our smart FIAKS communities across the globe. We understand that the fair use of a copyrighted work or work protected under any intellectual property law, including such use by reproduction in copies or by any other means specified under applicable laws, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. This section and our website may contain certain copyrighted or the work otherwise protected under any law that were not specifically authorised to be used by the copyright holder(s) or right holder(s) but which we believe in good faith are protected by the applicable laws and the fair use doctrine for one or more reasons noted above. If you have any specific concerns about this section or our website or our position on the fair use defence, please contact us at contactus@fiaks.com so we can discuss amicably. Thank you.